tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post1938642251911789023..comments2024-03-12T22:19:32.339-04:00Comments on The New Arthurian Economics: Jim Crotty: Stages and LevelsThe Arthurianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-2896395082291440052015-07-01T21:44:50.135-04:002015-07-01T21:44:50.135-04:00Jazz,
Yesterday you were having doubts about Crot...Jazz,<br /><br /><a href="http://newarthurianeconomics.blogspot.com/2015/06/crotty-challenges-samuelsons-keynes.html?showComment=1435666752875#c7073527390091812648" rel="nofollow">Yesterday</a> you were having doubts about Crotty's argument. Today you seem to have no doubts at all.<br /><br />Yesterday you did a quantitative evaluation of the 19th century. Today you do not trust data from before 1929.<br />The Arthurianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-38548951579215397392015-07-01T10:16:54.851-04:002015-07-01T10:16:54.851-04:00"The computation of annual GDP in the U.S. ha..."The computation of annual GDP in the U.S. has two parts, before 1929 and since that year. The earlier data are not as reliable as those for the last 83 years. The reason is simple: GDP data were not collected or even defined before the 1930s and thus any measures for years before 1932 rely on sources that were not collected for the purpose of constructing national income and product accounts."<br /><br />I woudn't trust it.<br /><br />http://www.measuringworth.com/usgdp/sourcegdp.php<br /><br />Cheers!<br />JzB<br /><br />Jazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.com