tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post6194439087917492801..comments2024-03-12T22:19:32.339-04:00Comments on The New Arthurian Economics: I like Ed Lambert's conclusionThe Arthurianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-5890601035996068912015-10-30T17:43:06.066-04:002015-10-30T17:43:06.066-04:00Bonito.
By the way... Schumpeter, out of context:...<i>Bonito</i>.<br /><br />By the way... Schumpeter, out of context: "The distinction is, in a sense, quite unrealistic. But if we do not make it, we shall never be able to say any more than that everything depends upon everything."<br />The Arthurianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-1377859694017844862015-10-30T08:04:57.747-04:002015-10-30T08:04:57.747-04:00You say...
"Deleveraging and the fall of lab...You say...<br /><br />"Deleveraging and the fall of labor share both contribute to the problem. Yes! The economy is a complex thing. Causes have consequences, and consequences become causes. It is important to point out, once in a while, that everything depends upon everything. (But what was it Schumpeter said?)"<br /><br />Marcus Aurelius said in book VI.38...<br /><br />"38. Frequently consider the connection of all things in the universe and their relation to one another. For in a manner all things are implicated with one another, and all in this way are friendly to one another; for one thing comes in order after another, and this is by virtue of the active movement and mutual conspiration and the unity of the substance (ix. 1)."<br /><br />Saludos<br /><br />IñigoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com