tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post7823574099562754400..comments2024-03-12T22:19:32.339-04:00Comments on The New Arthurian Economics: You remember John Nash, right?The Arthurianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-12196660694303896132018-09-07T01:45:30.337-04:002018-09-07T01:45:30.337-04:00Okay, well there is a good chance I didn't rea...Okay, well there is a good chance I didn't read the whole Nash paper.<br /><br />I definitely do that also, criticize Keynesians not Keynes. And I think it is most important to distinguish them from him.<br /><br />Thank you, O.Yama, for your insight.<br />The Arthurianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2098432983500045934.post-80726536100728523512018-08-03T00:22:29.449-04:002018-08-03T00:22:29.449-04:00Nash wasn't wrong and you are correct. The de...Nash wasn't wrong and you are correct. The definition you are quoting of Nash's is him distinguishing his criticism from Keynes and Keynesians. He is criticizing Keynesians not Keynes.O.Yamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10957374142799701163noreply@blogger.com