Spend enough time aimlessly looking at economic data and eventually you'll find something interesting. I had total private non-financial debt on the screen, and suddenly wondered how it compares to consumer debt. Consumer debt is a subset of total private non-financial so it is worth a look.
Graph #1: Household Debt relative to Total Private Non-Financial Debt |
Second thing: It is jiggy early, till around 1990, and smooth after that.
Third, it's about fifty-fifty. From 1950 to 2000, the curve is pretty well centered on the 0.50 line, and pretty well contained between 0.46 and 0.54. In other words, household debt runs between 45% and 55% of private non-financial debt until just after the year 2000. Then household debt goes high, something I've heard other people say.
If the household portion of private non-financial debt is roughly half the total, that means the rest of private non-financial debt is also roughly half the total. Or again, was roughly half the total, until the year 2000. Something I didn't know.
Fourth, the peak in the mid-1960s and the peak in the mid-1990s both top out at about 54% (0.54 on the graph). That's quite a coincidence. In addition, the upslope in the 1960s is comparable to the upslope in the 1990s. The two downslopes are similar also:
Graph #2: Similarity in the 1960s and 1990s |
Apparently FRED is down.
1 comment:
What I was getting to next, except FRED was down, was that debt was a lot higher in the 1990s than in the 1960s. That doesn't show up on the graph, because the graph shows a ratio.
And re-reading what I wrote, I come to this:
... household debt runs between 45% and 55% of private non-financial debt until just after the year 2000. Then household debt goes high ...
Yeah. But of course both debt measures were higher in the mid-1990s (and after) than in the mid 1960s. When I say "household debt goes high" after 2000, I mean high relative to the other debt measure. That should be obvious from the context -- the graph shows a ratio -- but you never know.
Post a Comment