Household Debt as a Percent of Total (TCMDO) Debt |
Thursday, June 5, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Challenging the Premisses
Start with the debt problem, three views of it,
and the most important thing. Here's a longer look at the debt problem.
Here's a short one on economic policy, some surprising trends, and a few unusual policy recommendations. How'd we get into this mess? Read Policy Venn and Policies of the Venn Overlap. Still with me? Read A Matter of Life and Death. And for an overview, download my 12-page PDF |
4 comments:
You can see the housing bubble in this debt, starting around the year 2000 and peaking around 28% of TCMDO debt.
You can also see two previous peaks, one around 1966 and one around 1980, both clearly higher than the housing bubble peak. So, why was the housing bubble a problem?
Maybe because 28 percent of a really really big number is more of a problem than 30 or 31 percent of a much smaller number. Maybe that's it.
Maybe look at something like debt service/disposable income?
Anyway, big picture - non-finance corporate debt down, federal down, household down.
What's up?
Cheers!
JzB
"Anyway, big picture - non-finance corporate debt down, federal down, household down... What's up?"
Exactly, Jazz. Stay tuned for Part Four! :)
Art wrote:
"You can also see two previous peaks, one around 1966 and one around 1980, both clearly higher than the housing bubble peak. So, why was the housing bubble a problem?"
The problem was imbalance. For 60 years US households kept their liabilities in nearly perfect balance with their home equity and then suddenly found themselves $8 trillion out of balance...(see graph):
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=CGm
That is about $50K per household drop in home equity while liabilities continued to grow. And there are still years to go before the balance is restored.
It is like being informed that half your savings have been wiped out - you don't react by going out and buying a new car (or by buying anything):
http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/charts/indicators/Retail-Sales.html?Retail-Sales-adjusted-for-population-and-inflation.gif
And since one person's spending is another one's income the drop in purchasing means 10 million people lose their jobs.
Post a Comment