"I'm pretty sure that by 'government' they mean all levels of government, not just Federal." That's what I said yesterday, showing this graph of the decline in the size of government relative to the size of the economy.
Graph #1 |
To actually see it, I looked at "Government: Federal" as a percent of "Government":
Graph #2: Federal as a Share of Government Employees |
The first graph shows that the number of all government employees fell, relative to the size of our economy. The second graph shows that the number of Federal government employees fell as a share of all government employees. So I'm thinking that the number of Federal government employees must have fallen a lot more, relative to the size of our economy, more than the fall we saw on the first graph.
The number of Federal employees relative to the size of our economy:
Graph #3 |
It peaks again, just above the 1.0 level in 1952, during the Korean war. From there, it falls below the 1.0 level and continues to drop.
On Graph #1, "below the 1.0 level" puts us off the chart: off the bottom of the chart. For 1953 and after, everything visible on Graph #1 is state and local. Federal employment, between 1.0 and zero, is lost somewhere in the blue border that runs across the bottom of that graph.
On Graph #3, the most recent level shows that the ratio is less than 0.2. That's 0.2 times a thousand people, or something less than 200 Federal employees per billion dollars of Real GDP. That's what the graph shows. (Read the Y-axis label if you don't believe me.)
To be sure, that doesn't include the U.S. Military and the CIA and the NSA and all. But it is less than 200 Federal employees per billion dollars of output, compared to 400 in Reagan's time, 600 in Nixon's time, and 800 under President Eisenhower.
1 comment:
Fewer than 200 Federal employees per billion dollars of Real GDP.
Post a Comment