Just for the hell of it, I downloaded quarterly data from FRED for the same period we looked at yesterday -- the start of 2009 to the most recent data. I put a Hodrick-Prescott on it in Excel, using a constant of 1600. That's the constant I'd ordinarily use for quarterly data. Here is the result:
Graph #1: Quarterly RGDP since Q1 2009 with an Unresponsive H-P Constant |
As with yesterday's post, I did the graph over using a more responsive constant:
Graph #2: Quarterly RGDP since Q1 2009 using a More Responsive H-P Constant |
The second graph here and the second graph yesterday are similar except for the RGDP data for the last year or so. The difference seems to be in the data itself, not in the H-P calculation.
So I grabbed the GDPnow data from FRED, for comparison:
Graph #3: GDPnow thru Q2 2016 |
2 comments:
I think the title of this post stands on its own without argument: GDP is not a good predictor of recession.
Jacob Assa:
"... the ‘value-added’ of financial services is imputed based on banks’ revenues and costs, and the inclusion of such income in GDP has caused a deterioration in its correlation with measures of employment and median income, as well as in its performance as a leading indicator."
Post a Comment